Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41327176›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025

The overuse of antimicrobials during the COVID-19 pandemic: data from 25 general hospitals in Shanxi, China.

Song Wang, Yang Tang, Yanbin Ma, Shuyun Wang, Rui Zhang, Qing Xie, Wanni Cai, Jinju Duan, Donghong Yin

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Song Wang *School of Pharmacy, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Yang Tang *Department of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Tianfu Hospital of Southwest Medical University (Meishan Tianfu New Area People's Hospital), Meishan, Sichuan, China.
Yanbin MaSchool of Pharmacy, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Shuyun WangDepartment of Pharmacy, Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Rui ZhangSchool of Pharmacy, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Qing XieSchool of Pharmacy, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Wanni CaiZhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jinju DuanDepartment of Pharmacy, Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China. duanjinju@163.com.
Donghong YinDepartment of Pharmacy, Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China. 13903430239@126.com.

Funding

Health Commission of Shanxi Province 2023XG032National Key Research and Development Program of China (2024YFC2510403)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, widespread empirical antimicrobial use was reported globally, often without confirmed bacterial infection. This study aimed to assess antimicrobial prescribing patterns, bacterial coinfection rates, and clinical outcomes among inpatients during the Omicron surge in Shanxi Province, China.

methodsWe conducted a multicentre retrospective study using data from 25 hospitals. Non-surgical inpatients discharged between December 1, 2022, and January 31, 2023, were included. Patients were categorized by COVID-19 status and antimicrobial use. Antimicrobial consumption was measured using defined daily doses (DDDs), days of therapy (DOT), and antimicrobial use density (AUD). Clinical outcomes, microbiological data, and adverse events were analyzed.

resultsAmong the 2064 inpatients included, 701 (34.0%) were diagnosed with COVID-19. Of these, 511 (72.9%) received antimicrobial therapy, while only 382 (54.5%) had a documented bacterial infection. Microbiological testing was positive in only 123 (6.0%) patients, yielding 139 isolates, of which 21 (15.1%) were multidrug-resistant. Consistently, COVID-19-positive patients were exposed to broad-spectrum agents more frequently: the proportions of both highly-restricted and restricted antimicrobials were significantly higher than in COVID-19-negative patients (4.7% vs. 2.8% and 68.2% vs. 61.9%, respectively; P < 0.05). Overall antimicrobial pressure was also greater in the positive group: antimicrobial-use density reached 84.28 vs. 47.07 DDDs/100 bed-days (P < 0.001), and days of therapy were 811.06 vs. 541.43 /1000 patient-days (P < 0.001). These differences translated into higher costs (median total hospitalization expense CNY 8013 vs. CNY 6447; P < 0.001) and prolonged stays (36.0% stayed 11–20 days vs. 22.4%; P < 0.001). Mortality did not differ across groups (P = 0.779).

conclusionThis study highlights the excessive use of antimicrobials in COVID-19 inpatients, often without confirmed bacterial infection. This overuse did not improve outcomes but contributed to increased healthcare costs and antimicrobial resistance risk. Rational antimicrobial management and improved diagnostic practices are crucial to combat this challenge in health care settings. CLINICAL TRIAL: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsBacterial InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsChinaCoinfectionFemaleHospitals, GeneralHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Anti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobialAntimicrobial stewardshipBacterial infectionCOVID-19

Identifiers

PMID41327176
PMCPMC12667163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.