Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41327175›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2025

Improving understanding of capacity to consent to sensitive HIV biomedical prevention research among adolescents and their parents or guardians in Rakai Uganda (ICARE): a quasi-experimental nonequivalent groups design protocol.

Philip Kreniske, Holly Isenberg, Fred Nalugoda, Susie Hoffman, Mary Ott, Godfrey Kigozi, Tom Lutalo, Neema Nakyanjo, William Ddaaki, Robert Ssekubugu and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Philip KreniskeInstitute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, NY, USA. philip.kreniske@sph.cuny.edu.
Holly IsenbergInstitute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, NY, USA.
Fred NalugodaRakai Health Sciences Program, Kalisizo, Uganda.
Susie HoffmanColumbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Mary OttIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
Godfrey KigoziRakai Health Sciences Program, Kalisizo, Uganda.
Tom LutaloRakai Health Sciences Program, Kalisizo, Uganda.
Neema NakyanjoRakai Health Sciences Program, Kalisizo, Uganda.
William DdaakiRakai Health Sciences Program, Kalisizo, Uganda.
Robert SsekubuguRakai Health Sciences Program, Kalisizo, Uganda.
Ying WeiColumbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Bai Xi Jasmine ChanInstitute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, NY, USA.
Kirsty SievwrightSacred Heart University, Fairfield, CT, USA.
Debbie MaldenColumbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
David SerwaddaRakai Health Sciences Program, Kalisizo, Uganda.
Gertrude NakigoziRakai Health Sciences Program, Kalisizo, Uganda.
John SantelliColumbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Improving understanding of Capacity to consent to sensitive biomedical HIV prevention Research among adolescents in Rakai Uganda (ICARE)R01MH134695 · NIMH · GRADUATE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND HEALTH POLICY · PI Philip Kreniske · 2024 to 2026
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH134695NIMH NIH HHS R01MH134695
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor research on sensitive topics like HIV, it is critical to understand the capacity of adolescents to provide informed consent, as parental consent has been identified as the greatest barrier to adolescent participation in biomedical research. In many countries including low-and middle-income countries, where 90% of adolescents live, adolescents can consent to sexual and reproductive healthcare but require parent/guardian permission to participate in research before age 18 - leading to adolescent underrepresentation and systematic exclusion from biomedical and behavioral studies. Among adults, research has identified effective biomedical HIV prevention tools such as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) that have successfully decreased HIV transmission. Youth in East and Southern Africa have the highest HIV incidence in the world, yet less than 1% of biomedical HIV prevention trials include minor adolescents. Thus, developmentally tailored HIV prevention and care research for adolescents and young adults is urgently needed.

methodsImproving understanding of Capacity to consent to sensitive biomedical Research among adolescents in Rakai Uganda (ICARE) will leverage The Rakai Community Cohort Study (RCCS) to test adolescent capacity to consent to biomedical research, identify differences in developmental decision-making, characterize eligibility for, beliefs about and interest in oral and injectable pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), and construct a digital toolkit for including adolescents in biomedical research. The RCCS presents a unique opportunity to compare cognitive capacity to consent for biomedical research among adolescents with and without prior research experience at three developmental stages - early (10-14 years), middle (15-17 years), and late (18-19 years) - with the cognitive capacity of their parents/guardians. DISCUSSION: Limited data are available on adolescents' actual capacity to consent, particularly in low-and middle-income countries and low resource, high HIV prevalence settings. Findings will contribute to addressing a major barrier to research participation through an examination of the capacity of adolescents to comprehend risks, benefits, and the other elements of informed consent and, therefore, to provide informed consent to biomedical research. ICARE has the potential to offer guidance for ethical boards seeking to harmonize adolescent treatment and prevention with research procedures, thus addressing a major barrier to adolescent research participation.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchHIV InfectionsInformed ConsentInformed Consent By MinorsLegal GuardiansParental ConsentParentsAdolescentFemaleHumansMalePre-Exposure ProphylaxisResearch DesignUgandaYoung AdultAdolescent AutonomyAdolescent Research EthicsDecision-MakingInformed ConsentParental PermissionResearch Participation

Identifiers

PMID41327175
PMCPMC12781717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.