ArticleBMC public health2025
Educational programmes for reducing depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms among migrant workers: a scoping review and evidence synthesis.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMigrant workers face additional stress from language and cultural barriers in host countries. Educational programs focus on supporting acculturation of migrant workers are often believed to help stress-relief by providing knowledge for their language learning, cultural understanding, and inclusive practises, but no conclusion has been made on the effectiveness. This review aims to address this gap by examining the impact of acculturation programmes in managing psychological distress among migrant workers, with anxiety and depression as primary outcomes, and stress as secondary outcome.
methodsWe searched six bibliographic databases (Embase, Medline, CINAHL Complete, PsycInfo, SocINDEX, and Cochrane Library) from inception to 12 September 2024 using keywords "migrant workers AND education AND (stress OR anxiety OR depress)" and grey literatures.
resultsEleven articles were critically appraised as identified from 4795 searched titles. Included studies were primarily conducted in the United States, involved predominately blue-collar workers/ health care workers, and females. Seven types of interventions were identified. Specifically, positive impacts on stress levels were observed following lay health educators' intervention (MD: -4.03, p < 0.01 in Latina migrants), peer groups, and spiritual retreat courses demonstrated significant evidence of reducing stress. Peer groups resulted in a significant improvement in perceived stress levels among resettled working refugees (MD: -5.00, p < 0.0001). Similarly, spiritual retreat courses significantly improved perceived stress levels in Nigerian women workers, with a mean difference of -4.05 (p < 0.01). However, improvement in anxiety after life skills trainings was insignificant. Overall, such programs can effectively address stress and depression, ultimately improving the overall well-being of migrant workers in host countries.
conclusionsAcculturation programmes covering life skills and work skills are common approaches in supporting migrant workers' mental health. Overall, the findings suggest that migrant-local support groups, lay health educators' interventions, peer groups, and spiritual retreat courses, can effectively address stress and depression among migrant workers. However, heterogeneity exists between studies. Acculturation programmes constitute feasible solutions to address the global mental health crisis. Future research should be done to investigate acculturative educational programmes impact in a larger population. REGISTRATION: This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021292998).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.