ArticleBMC public health2025
Interaction between dietary quality and depression on glycaemic control in type 2 diabetics.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPoorer diet quality and depression were both independent influences on poor glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). The current study aimed to investigate the interaction between dietary quality and depression on glycaemic control in patients with T2DM.
methodsIn the cross-sectional study, participants were selected using a multistage cluster random method in Xuzhou, and the Meal Frequency Questionnaire and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 were respectively used to investigate 1088 patients' dietary quality and depression. Data from physical measurement, glycated haemoglobin, and blood lipid detection were also assessed.
resultsThe rate of poor glycaemic control was 38.3% in patients with T2DM with poor dietary quality. After adjusting for other variables, the risk of poor glycaemic control in patients with T2DM with poor dietary quality and no depression was 2.04 times higher than that in patients with T2DM with good dietary quality and no depression; the risk of poor glycaemic control in patients with T2DM with good dietary quality and depression was 1.96 times higher than that in patients with T2DM with good dietary quality and no depression; when poor dietary quality and depression co-existed, patients with T2DM with poor dietary quality and depression were at greater risk for poor glycaemic control.
conclusionThe study reveals that in individuals with T2DM, there was a significant additive interaction between poor dietary quality and depressive symptoms, exacerbating poor glycaemic control. This synergistic effect suggested that concurrent management of dietary habits and mental health is crucial for optimizing glycaemic outcomes in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.