Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41327162›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Reading between the lines. Older people's maltreatment - from detection to reporting in primary healthcare.

S Frazão, C Morais, P Norton, P Vieira Pinto, T Magalhães

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S Frazão *Department of Public Health and Forensic Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Al. Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, Porto, 4200-319, Portugal. lalanda77@hotmail.com.
C Morais *USF Uarcos, Local Healthcare Unit of Alto Minho, Arcos de Valdevez, 4970-458, Portugal.
P NortonDepartment of Public Health and Forensic Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Al. Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, Porto, 4200-319, Portugal.
P Vieira PintoMEDCIDS - Department of Community Medicine Health Information and Decisions, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Rua Dr. Plácido da Costa, Porto, 4200-450, Portugal.
T MagalhãesCenter for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS@RISE), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, 4200-319, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The issue of older people's maltreatment (OPM) is gaining increased attention worldwide because of its significant short and long-term severe consequences. Healthcare professionals play a crucial role in detecting, reporting, and managing these cases, but many difficulties in these procedures exist, and underreporting is very frequent. Thus, the aim of this study was to identify the extent of and difficulties in detecting and reporting suspected OPM cases by general practitioner physicians in Portugal. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among general practice physicians (GPPs) to assess their perceptions, experiences, and challenges in detecting and reporting older people maltreatment (OPM). The 13-item questionnaire explored sociodemographic factors, responsibility, confidence, reporting practices, and training needs, providing an updated insight into OPM management in primary healthcare. It was anonymous and conducted through a self-report questionnaire distributed in paper format to GPPs working in the National Health Service in the Northern of Portugal. We received 356 completed questionnaires for further analysis. The findings indicate that, on average, physicians suspect fewer than one OPM case per year; only 32% suspected at least one case in the previous year, although 55.3% and 54.5% of the physician's revealed confidence in identifying signs of physical abuse and neglect, respectively. The ambiguity of the psychological symptoms was identified as a great challenge in detection (50.3%). Only 36.5% of the physicians were acquainted with the procedures for reporting suspected cases; however, of the 32% who suspected at least of one case in the previous year, only 39.5% reported all or at least some suspected cases; 16.9% chose not to report the case when requested by the victim or his/her caregivers. Most (91.6%) expressed a willingness to adopt protocols to assist them in managing such cases. A correlation was found between physicians' satisfaction with OPM reporting training during undergraduate and postgraduate education and their ability to report (p = 0.024), as well as with the number of reported cases (p = 0.003). Thus, the detection and reporting of OPM by physicians remain major challenges that need to be overcome. Further research and greater awareness of the importance of these procedures are essential to ensure victims' protection, safety, and health.

Indexed as

Elder AbuseGeneral PractitionersMandatory ReportingPrimary Health CareAdultAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPortugalSurveys and QuestionnairesAbuseMaltreatmentNeglectOlder peoplePhysicianPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID41327162
PMCPMC12777358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.