Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41327158›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Beyond DALY: public funding of health innovation in Brazil as a political strategy for equity in the Global South.

Jabson Herber Profiro de Oliveira, Igor Eduardo Silva Arruda, Manoel Raimundo de Sena Júnior, Fábio Henrique Cavalcanti de Oliveira, Monica Felts de La Roca Soares, Carlos Augusto Grabois Gadelha, José Lamartine Soares Sobrinho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jabson Herber Profiro de OliveiraInstituto Nacional de Ciência Tecnologia do Complexo Econômico-Industrial da Saúde - iCEIS, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil. jabson_f16@yahoo.com.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0356-8083
Igor Eduardo Silva ArrudaInstituto Nacional de Ciência Tecnologia do Complexo Econômico-Industrial da Saúde - iCEIS, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6557-4748
Manoel Raimundo de Sena JúniorUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6535-5556
Fábio Henrique Cavalcanti de OliveiraInstituto Nacional de Ciência Tecnologia do Complexo Econômico-Industrial da Saúde - iCEIS, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0181-7624
Monica Felts de La Roca SoaresInstituto Nacional de Ciência Tecnologia do Complexo Econômico-Industrial da Saúde - iCEIS, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4873-915X
Carlos Augusto Grabois GadelhaFundação Oswaldo Cruz - Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9148-8819
José Lamartine Soares SobrinhoInstituto Nacional de Ciência Tecnologia do Complexo Econômico-Industrial da Saúde - iCEIS, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil. jose.ssobrinho@ufpe.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3280-0294

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDisability-adjusted life years (DALYs) are widely used to prioritize public funding for science, technology and innovation (ST&I) in health. In universal systems such as Brazil's Unified Health System (SUS), however, allocation decisions may also incorporate broader political and social considerations.

objectiveTo assess whether Brazilian public ST&I funding for neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) and Zika (2006-2019) aligned with disease burden measured by DALYs, and to examine how observed funding patterns reflect political commitments to health equity and innovation in the Global South.

methodsCross-sectional analysis of national research calls (2006-2019). Actual disbursements were compared with expected values proportional to the DALY distribution for each disease. Associations between DALYs and funding were evaluated using Spearman correlation.

resultsHigh-burden diseases-including tuberculosis, Chagas disease and schistosomiasis-received less funding than expected, while Zika and leprosy obtained disproportionately higher investments. Overall, the correlation between DALYs and funding was weak and not statistically significant; a significant negative trend emerged within a subgroup of major NTDs.

conclusionsDALYs did not operate as the sole criterion guiding Brazil's ST&I funding. Political urgency, social mobilization and SUS operational priorities influenced allocation, indicating that ST&I functions not only as a technical instrument but also as a political strategy to reduce health inequities and foster context‑appropriate innovation for vulnerable populations in the Global South.

Indexed as

Disability-Adjusted Life YearsFinancing, GovernmentHealth EquityNeglected DiseasesPoliticsBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesHumansZika Virus InfectionDisability-Adjusted life yearsFinancing, governmentNeglected diseasesResearch financingSupport of research

Identifiers

PMID41327158
PMCPMC12771692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.