Trial reportBMC urology2025
Comparative evaluation of safety and efficacy of dapoxetine, silodosin, and citalopram in the management of premature ejaculation: a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in BMC urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07113145 (Comparative Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Dapoxetine, Silodosin, and Citalopram in the Management of Premature Ejaculation), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparative Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Dapoxetine, Silodosin, and Citalopram in the Management of Premature Ejaculation: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPremature ejaculation (PE) is a prevalent male sexual dysfunction with limited comparative data on pharmacological treatments. This randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of four active pharmacological interventions for lifelong PE.
methodsA prospective randomized trial was conducted from June 2024 to March 2025 at Beni-Suef University Hospital. Four hundred eligible patients diagnosed with lifelong PE were randomly allocated to one of four active treatment groups (n = 100 per group): (1) citalopram 20 mg/day, (2) silodosin 4 mg/day, (3) dapoxetine 30 mg on-demand (1-3 h before intercourse), or (4) dapoxetine 30 mg daily. The primary outcome was the change in intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) measured by stopwatch. Secondary outcomes included changes in the Premature Ejaculation Profile Questionnaire (PEPQ) scores and the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA with post-hoc tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical data.
resultsAll four treatment groups demonstrated significant within-group improvements in IELT from baseline (p < 0.001 for all). The citalopram group exhibited the greatest mean IELT increase (from 110.4 ± 31.5s to 391.2 ± 45.9s; 260% median gain), outperforming the daily dapoxetine (220%), on-demand dapoxetine (197%), and silodosin (149.5%) groups. Improvements in PEPQ scores mirrored the IELT findings, with citalopram showing a 300% improvement compared to 225%, 166.7%, and 175% in the daily dapoxetine, on-demand dapoxetine, and silodosin groups, respectively. In inter-group comparisons, citalopram was superior to silodosin in all PEPQ domains (p < 0.001) and to both dapoxetine regimens in the domain of interpersonal difficulty (p < 0.01). Adverse event profiles differed: silodosin was associated with a higher incidence of ejaculatory dysfunction (23% retrograde ejaculation), while daily dapoxetine led to more systemic effects (18% dizziness).
conclusionIn this direct head-to-head comparison of active treatments for lifelong PE, daily citalopram (20 mg) demonstrated superior efficacy in prolonging IELT and improving psychosocial outcomes compared to daily or on-demand dapoxetine and silodosin. The findings suggest that citalopram is a highly effective first-line option, while the dose-dependent efficacy of dapoxetine and the distinct side-effect profile of silodosin provide alternative considerations for personalized treatment strategies.
trial registrationThis clinical trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT07113145) on 7 August 2025 after the enrollment of the first participant and is therefore retrospectively registered."
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.