ArticleBMC public health2025
Mathematical modeling of public health policy for international travelers (PHPIT): a case study of the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFollowing border closures implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic, Thailand subsequently reopened its international borders, employing public health policy for international travelers (PHPIT) to mitigate the importation of COVID-19 cases and minimize potential missed cases. These measures included departure country risk classification, vaccination certificate requirement, pre-departure and entry testing, and quarantine.
methodsTo assess the effectiveness of these interventions, we developed a cross-border control model, which integrates cluster analysis and mathematical modeling to estimate reductions in missed cases in Thailand under various scenarios.
resultsOur findings indicated that, as a single measure, when compared with implementing no interventions, quarantine for 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14 days reduced missed cases by 45%, 58%, 72%, 80%, 88%, and 94%, respectively. Departure country risk classification reduced missed cases by up to 72% and vaccination certificate requirement by up to 24%. Testing once at 72, 48, 24, or 0 h pre-departure reduced missed cases by 5%, 7%, 10%, and 14% respectively. Entry testing (the "test-and-go" policy) reduced missed cases by 29%. Strategically combining quarantine with other PHPIT measures could achieve a 46-98% reduction in missed cases, with the maximum reduction in missed cases when implementing 14-day quarantine together with pre-departure testing.
conclusionsQuarantine could serve as a standard measure to minimize missed cases and be optimized by a vaccination certificate requirement. Meanwhile, testing and departure country risk classification could be withdrawn due to their minimal effectiveness and potential for discrimination, respectively. The combinations and their optimization should be guided by domestic transmission dynamics, healthcare system capacities, societal perspectives, and economic adaptability. Future PHPIT implementation should incorporate pre-evaluation to balance intervention effectiveness, equity for international travelers, and public health and economic security.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.