Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41327099›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Germline mutational landscape in a large cohort of Indian breast cancer.

John Peter, Bani Jolly, Rajdeep Raha, Jayalakshmi Jothi, Avrajit Chakraborty, Swaminathan Ganapathi Raman, Selvi Radhakrishnan, Sridhar Sivasubbu, Vinod Scaria, Sundarasamy Mahalingam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

John Peter *Department of Biotechnology, National Cancer Tissue Biobank, Indian Institute of Technology-Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600036, India.
Bani Jolly *Karkinos Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., IBC Knowledge Park, Bannerghatta Main Rd, Bhavani Nagar, S.G. Palya, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560029, India.
Rajdeep RahaKarkinos Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., IBC Knowledge Park, Bannerghatta Main Rd, Bhavani Nagar, S.G. Palya, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560029, India.
Jayalakshmi JothiDepartment of Biotechnology, National Cancer Tissue Biobank, Indian Institute of Technology-Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600036, India.
Avrajit ChakrabortyDepartment of Biotechnology, National Cancer Tissue Biobank, Indian Institute of Technology-Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600036, India.
Swaminathan Ganapathi RamanDepartment of Oncology, Kumaran Hospital, Kilpauk, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600010, India.
Selvi RadhakrishnanChennai Breast Centre, MRC Nagar, Raja Annamali Puram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600028, India.
Sridhar SivasubbuKarkinos Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Rupa Renaissance, B-2101, Turbhe Midc Rd, TTC Industrial Area, MIDC Industrial Area, Turbhe, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400705, India.
Vinod ScariaKarkinos Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., IBC Knowledge Park, Bannerghatta Main Rd, Bhavani Nagar, S.G. Palya, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560029, India. Vinod.scaria@karkinos.in.
Sundarasamy MahalingamDepartment of Biotechnology, National Cancer Tissue Biobank, Indian Institute of Technology-Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600036, India. mahalingam@iitm.ac.in.

Funding

Institute of Eminence-Centre of Excellence "Centre for Cancer Genomics and Molecular Therapeutics", Ministry of Education Govt. of India and Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India SP2223/1242/CPETWOCGMHOC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer has emerged as the leading malignancy among Indian women, with a notable subset of cases linked to inherited genetic predisposition. Germline testing is a vital tool for identifying individuals at elevated risk, guiding targeted therapies such as PARP inhibitors, and informing preventive strategies through family-based screening. However, population-specific data from India remain limited, and most studies have focused narrowly on BRCA1/2. In this study, we employed high-depth germline whole exome sequencing to comprehensively evaluate cancer susceptibility in 479 unselected Indian breast cancer patients sourced from a National Cancer Tissue Biobank. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were identified in 24.6% of the cohort, including 8.35% in BRCA1/2. Notably, 67% of these findings were in non-BRCA genes, including HRR and tumor suppressor genes, which would be missed by BRCA-only testing. The unbiased, broad-panel approach enabled evaluation of emerging susceptibility genes such as RECQL. Additionally, we identified two clinically significant DPYD variants (c.1679T > G and c.1905 + 1G > A), associated with fluoropyrimidine toxicity risk. Beyond cancer risk, medically actionable secondary findings were detected in 21.7% of individuals, with variants in non-oncology genes listed in ACMG SF v3.2. Together, these findings highlight the genetic heterogeneity of hereditary breast cancer in India and demonstrate the clinical utility of comprehensive germline testing. While targeted multi-gene panels may suffice in clinical settings, whole-exome sequencing provides additional benefits by uncovering ancestry-specific susceptibility genes and actionable variants relevant for therapy and prevention in genetically diverse populations.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGerm-Line MutationAdultAgedBRCA1 ProteinCohort StudiesExome SequencingFemaleGenetic TestingHumansIndiaMiddle AgedSouth Asian PeopleBRCA1 ProteinBreast Cancer, Genomics, Whole Exome Sequencing, Germline Testing

Identifiers

PMID41327099
PMCPMC12797521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.