ArticleBMC neurology2025
Characteristics of person-centred practice in the stroke patient trajectory: a scoping review.
Article in BMC neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Variability in Stroke Journeys: A Qualitative Study of Experiences of Persons With Stroke.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Nurse-Led Identification of Financial Toxicity in Stroke Patients Using Machine Learning: Development and Validation of an Associational Prediction Model.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Characteristics of person-centred practice in the stroke patient trajectory: a scoping review.BMC neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPerson-centred practice (PCP) is gaining increasing attention in healthcare practice and research. However, further knowledge is needed to understand PCP in stroke care. The aim of this study was to explore the characteristics of PCP in the stroke patient trajectory.
methodsThe review was conducted using the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science, along with grey literature sources. Two reviewers screened studies for inclusion. Data were extracted using a pilot-tested tool and analysed using content analysis for qualitative data and descriptive statistics for quantitative data.
resultsNinety-six studies from diverse healthcare contexts and countries were included. The results showed significant variability in the implementation of PCP in the stroke patient trajectory. Key components of PCP that dominate the literature include shared decision-making, holistic care, and information provision. Several categories of facilitators and barriers emerged from the data, including patient participation and interprofessional practice. Recommendations for practice emphasised the need for training healthcare professional in PCP principles and the development of tools to support shared decision-making. Research gaps include PCP gaps, theoretical, methodological, and implementation gaps, as well as tools and digital health gaps.
conclusionsThis scoping review highlights the variability and complexity of implementing PCP in stroke care, emphasising the need for further research and development across the stroke patient trajectory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.