Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41327062›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2025

Developing and validating a machine learning pharmaceutical therapy recommender system for US-based hospital in-patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

Maximin Lange, Urvik Mehta, Nikolaos Koutsouleris, Feras Fayez, Ricardo Twumasi

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maximin LangeInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crispingy Park, SE5, London, UK. maximin.lange@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6253-8741
Urvik MehtaBarts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0003-1126-8205
Nikolaos KoutsoulerisInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crispingy Park, SE5, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6825-6262
Feras FayezImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0001-0103-9500
Ricardo TwumasiInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crispingy Park, SE5, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0194-7250

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo drug recommender system exists to guide antipsychotic medication selection for hospital in-patients with schizophrenia. This study developed and validated a prototype personalised medication recommender system for in-hospital patients with schizophrenia.

methodsThis prognostic study analysed data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database on patients prescribed antipsychotic medications with hospital admission diagnoses of schizophrenic disorders between 2008 and 2022. Five similarity-based algorithms (two collaborative filtering and three distance-based representation methods) were evaluated using nested patient-wise cross-validation. The best performing model underwent external validation across geographic and temporal contexts using (a) Northwestern Intensive Care Unit and (b) Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III datasets. Treatment success was measured through an affinity score (range 0–1) incorporating time between admissions, medication switches, and length of stay. Algorithm performance was assessed using root-mean-square error and mean average precision at position three, with visit-specific analysis across first, second, and third admissions.

resultsAmong 1,152 patients (660 first visits, 251 s visits, 241 third visits), cosine similarity-based collaborative filtering with K = 7 neighbours achieved optimal performance. Internal cross-validation demonstrated excellent prediction accuracy (root-mean-square error 0.116, standard deviation 0.007) and moderate recommendation quality (mean average precision at position three 0.490, standard deviation 0.029), improving to 0.697 (standard deviation 0.019) for first visits only. Geographic validation on 32 patients maintained recommendation quality (mean average precision at position three 0.432) despite increased prediction uncertainty (root-mean-square error 0.498). Temporal validation on 66 patients showed similar patterns (mean average precision at position three 0.359, root-mean-square error 0.578). Second-visit recommendations demonstrated exceptional transferability across validation contexts, achieving mean average precision at position three scores up to 0.813. In 163 cases where the model disagreed with attending clinicians, clinicians’ top-3 recommendations achieved significantly superior treatment outcomes (mean difference − 0.122 affinity points, 95% confidence interval: -0.145 to -0.098, p < 0.001, Cohen’s d=-0.81).

conclusionsThis proof-of-concept study demonstrates feasibility of developing a machine learning-based medication recommender system for hospital in-patients with schizophrenia, that appear to maintain recommendation quality across different healthcare institutions and time periods. Prospective clinical trials are needed to establish real-world effectiveness and safety.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsMachine LearningSchizophreniaAdultAlgorithmsFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesAntipsychotic AgentsAntipsychoticsClinical decision supportCollaborative filteringMachine learningMedication recommendationPersonalised medicineSchizophreniaTreatment outcomes

Identifiers

PMID41327062
PMCPMC12777454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.