ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Added value of slow diffusion coefficient (SDC) for the separation of benign and malignant parotid gland tumors by diffusion weighted imaging: preliminary results.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of number-of-excitations (NEX) for the usability of free-breathing acquired diffusion-derived 'vessel density' (DDVD) and slow diffusion coefficient (SDC) maps in separating liver cysts, hemangiomas, and solid masses with a focus on small lesions.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- The impacts of time of echo and time of repetition on slow diffusion coefficient (SDC) measure and the potential age- and gender-related variations in liver and spleen SDC values: studies of healthy volunteers.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Multimodal MRI Diffusion and Multiphase CT Parameters for Estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients with Acute Renal Obstruction.Research and reports in urology · 2026Article
- Improvement of magnetic resonance imaging diffusion metric 'slow diffusion coefficient (SDC)' over apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) genotyping in diffuse gliomas.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Reliable diagnosis of liver focal nodular hyperplasia by a combination of T2 weighted signal and three diffusion magnetic resonance metrics of diffusion-derived 'vessel density', slow diffusion coefficient, and apparent diffusion coefficient: a validation study of two centers' data.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiffusion weighted imaging (DWI) has been used to evaluate parotid gland tumors. Warthin's tumors (WTs) have very high diffusion-derived vessel 'density' (DDVD) and low ADC, while pleomorphic adenomas (PAs) have moderately high DDVD and very high apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). These two most common benign tumors (BTs) can be largely separated by a combination of ADC and DDVD. However, most of the MTs (malignant tumors) had moderately high DDVD and low ADC, the differentiation between BT and MT remains challenging. Slow diffusion coefficient (SDC) is a novel metric being proposed to measure in vivo tissue slow diffusion. In its basic form, SDC is derived from a high b-value DWI image and a higher b-value DWI image. This study tested the application of SDC to evaluate parotid gland tumors.
methodsTwenty-four PAs, 16 WTs, and 14 MTs had DWI at 3T. ADC was calculated with b = 0 and 800 s/mm
resultsParotid gland tumors had a higher SDC than normal parotid gland tissue with SDCr > 1. SDCr was on average PAs (median: 3.075) > MTs (2.755) > WTs (2.250). Separation of BT against MT by ADCr alone, by a combination of ADCr and SDCr, and by a combination of ADCr, SDCr, and DDVDr had AUROC of 0.7393, 0.8018, 0.8054, respectively. The probability of a tumor being MT is given by: ln(p/1-p) = 0.7006*SDCr-3.198*ADCr + 1.417; or ln(p/1-p)=-0.2225*DDVDr-3.41ADCr + 0.7603*SDCr + 2.103. SDCr was positively correlated with ADCr with a Pearson r of 0.624, while SDCr was not apparently correlated with DDVDr.
conclusionThis study tested the principle of applying four b-values DWI to generate three diffusion metrics, namely, ADC, SDC, and DDVD, to evaluate parotid gland tumors. A combination of these three diffusion metrics may offer clinically useful separation of MT from BT. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.