Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41327059›Full record

ReviewBMC primary care2025

To stay or leave: an integrative review of factors, personas, and recommendations for retaining family physicians in Canada.

Udoka Okpalauwaekwe, Brian K MacPhee, Lindsay Balezantis, Vivian R Ramsden, Angela Baerwald

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Udoka OkpalauwaekweResearch Division, Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7M 3Y5, Canada. udokaokpala.uo@usask.ca.
Brian K MacPheeCollege of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7M 3Y5, Canada.
Lindsay BalezantisCollege of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7M 3Y5, Canada.
Vivian R RamsdenResearch Division, Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7M 3Y5, Canada.
Angela BaerwaldWomen's Health Research Laboratory, Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7M 3Y5, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFamily physicians are the cornerstone of primary health care in Canada. Yet, retention remains a growing concern. Challenges in retaining family physicians poses serious implications for healthcare accessibility, continuity, and equity across all practice contexts in Canada, including (but not limited to) rural, remote, urban, and underserved communities. Currently, 25% of Canadians do not have a primary care provider. While much attention has been given to recruitment, less is known about the multifaceted and intersecting factors that influence whether practicing family physicians and family medicine trainees (including Canadian Medical Graduates (CMGs) and International Medical Graduates (IMGs)), remain in sustained comprehensive practice in Canada. This review synthesizes the literature to identify key drivers of family physician retention and offers evidence-based recommendations.

methodsWe conducted an integrative review of peer-reviewed literature published between January 1, 2000, and March 30, 2025, following Whittemore and Knafl’s five-stage methodology. A systematic search was carried out across five electronic databases. Included studies were assessed for quality and thematically analyzed using a five-domain coding framework: personal, family, community, professional, and structural/systemic. Composite personas were developed to illustrate recurring physician retention trajectories and evidence-based recommendations were thematized across our five-domain coding framework.

resultsOf the 1,613 records screened, 23 studies met inclusion criteria. Factors influencing retention were identified across all five domains. Structural and professional barriers, including licensure restrictions, administrative burden, and limited autonomy, emerged as the most consistent deterrents. Facilitators included strong community ties, spousal support, team-based practice environments, and access to continuing professional development. We identified and developed seven physician personas to create a portrait of the diverse experiences of family physicians in Canada. Key recommendations included reforming licensure and payment models, enhancing mentorship and CME access, supporting spousal integration, and fostering culturally safe, community-rooted team-based practice models.

conclusionRetaining family physicians in Canada is a relational challenge that requires collaborative, multi-level change. Tailored, context-specific retention strategies co-designed with physicians and communities can enhance sustainability and health equity especially in rural, remote and underserved communities.

Indexed as

Physicians, FamilyCanadaForeign Medical GraduatesHumansPrimary Health CareCanadaCommunity integrationFamily physiciansInternational medical graduatePhysician retentionPrimary careRural medicineWorkforce planning

Identifiers

PMID41327059
PMCPMC12777385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.