ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Multi - scale context U-net for breast cancer postoperative radiotherapy in patients with brachial plexus.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn this study, we propose a Multi-Scale Context U-net (MSC-U-net) network model for the precise and automated segmentation of the brachial plexus in patients who have undergone postoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer.
methodsA total of 389 patients who underwent postoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer were included in the training set, while 55 patients were included in the test set. The network model proposed in this study was optimized and trained to achieve the most accurate segmentation results. The performance of the model was evaluated using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and the 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95). To further validate the effectiveness of the segmentation, comparison and ablation experiments were conducted. Subsequently, the clinical practicability was assessed within a clinical setting.
resultsMSC-U-net achieved precise segmentation results with DSC and HD95 values of 79.16 ± 0.05% and 6.95 ± 0.76 mm, respectively, in the test set. In comparison experiments with four other classical networks, the model showed significant statistical differences (p < 0.05) in performance. Ablation experiments further confirmed that the MSC-U-net network model achieved the best segmentation performance (p < 0.05). The radiation oncologists’ subjective evaluations also demonstrated the clinical applicability of the MSC-U-net network model. There was no statistically significant difference between manual segmentation and model segmentation in terms of segmentation accuracy and radiation dose (p > 0.05). The above results demonstrate the superior performance of the MSC-U-net network model in medical image segmentation, and also indicate its effectiveness in clinical applications.
conclusionsIn the context of segmenting the brachial plexus in localization CT images of breast cancer patients after postoperative radiotherapy, MSC-U-net has demonstrated exceptional performance, significantly minimizing the manual segmentation accuracy issues caused by human factors. This network exhibits high efficiency in automatic segmentation and a high level of accuracy. Notably, the MSC-U-net network holds significant importance in the advancement of radiotherapy automation, and it also offers valuable insights for future research in the field of automatic organ segmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.