ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2025
Predictors of treatment adherence in cardiovascular patients based on social adequacy.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND
objectivesCardiovascular diseases are one of the most common chronic diseases and disturb the performance and social, familial, and occupational relations of patients. Adherence to treatment influenced by various factors such as self-efficacy, beliefs and social adequacy. METHODOLOGY: This study was conducted to determine the predictors of adherence to treatment in cardiovascular patients based on social adequacy. Study design was Analytical descriptive cross-sectional study. The research population included cardiovascular patients discharged from the treatment centers .sample size was estimated to be 275 patients. The participants were selected by stratified random sampling based on inclusion criteria. Data were collected by a demographic information form, Fellner's Social adequacy Questionnaire, and Modanlo's Treatment Adherence Scale. Data were analyzed by SPSS software using descriptive and analytic statistics. Descriptive statistics summarized scores, while Pearson correlations examined relationships, and multiple linear regression identified predictors of happiness, with significance at p < 0.05.
resultsthe mean total social adequacy score of the patients participating in the study was (232 ± 29). The highest and lowest scores among the dimensions were related to the Behavioral skills dimension (184 ± 23) and the Cognitive skills dimension (15 ± 2), respectively. There was a significant correlation between social adequacy and adherence to treatment (p = 0.001, r = 0.66). There was also a significant relationship between adherence to treatment and four dimensions of social adequacy(p = 0.001).
conclusionConclusion: Given the significant relationship between social competence and adherence to treatment, it is essential for health professionals in the community to promote factors such as social competence in patients, which can help in planning adherence to the treatment regimen and lifestyle changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.