ArticleBMC plant biology2025
Metagenomic insights reveal the impact of natural farming on soil nutrients, enzyme activities, microbial communities, and yield in turmeric cultivation.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTurmeric (Curcuma longa L.) is a key spice, medicinal and industrially important crop that is increasingly being cultivated under sustainable practices such as natural farming system (NFS). This study compares NFS and conventional/chemical farming system (CFS) in terms of soil physicochemical properties, enzyme activities, microbial diversity, and yield parameters, providing a comprehensive understanding of their ecological and agronomic impacts.
resultsField experiments evaluated nine NFS treatments alongside CFS for high throughput amplicon (16S rRNA and ITS) metagenomics, soil physicochemical properties, enzyme activities, and yield parameters. NFS treatments with ≥ 5 t/ha mulching and 4 t/ha Ghanjeevamrit (i.e. NFS-T6 and NFS-T9) significantly enhanced soil organic carbon (~ 0.25%), nitrogen (~ 239.9 kg/ha), and phosphorus (~ 38.16 kg/ha), alongside elevated enzyme activities like alkaline phosphatase (ALP; ~112.11 µg PNP/g/hr) and protease (PR; ~16.22 µg Tyrosine/g/hr). These treatments also exhibited significantly higher microbial richness and evenness (Shannon index: ~5.09; Simpson index: ~0.981). NFS enriched beneficial bacterial (e.g., Priestia, unclassified Acidobacteria, etc.) and saprophytic fungal genera (e.g., Humicola, Mortierella, etc.), enhancing soil nutrient cycling and soil health. Conversely, CFS enriched chemical-resilient and pathogenic taxa (e.g., Alternaria, Curvularia, etc.). NFS-T5 (40.66 t/ha) and NFS-T9 (40.47 t/ha) yielded over twice the fresh rhizome compared to CFS. NFS treatments recorded higher net returns and Benefit-Cost Ratios (BCRs) of 7.51 to 10.57. Microbial profiling of natural farming (NF) inputs (Beejamrit, Jeevamrit, and Ghanjeevamrit) showed distinct bacterial and fungal communities influencing soil microbiome structure. Co-occurrence network analysis of NF soils revealed that microbial taxa introduced via NF inputs had limited integration into native soil communities, indicating selective incorporation governed by competitive ecological interactions.
conclusionsNatural farming practices significantly enhanced soil fertility, microbial community structure, enzymatic activity (ALP and PR), and turmeric productivity with superior BCRs. These findings provide scientific evidence supporting natural farming as a viable and sustainable agricultural approach, contributing to improved soil health and crop performance in turmeric cultivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.