ArticleStatistics in medicine2025
An Augmented Likelihood Approach Incorporating Error-Prone Auxiliary Data Into a Survival Analysis.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this big data era, we can readily access extensive clinical data from large observational studies or electronic health records (EHR). Data accuracy can vary according to the measurement method. For example, clinical variables extracted by automated computer algorithms or obtained from participant self-reported medical history can be error-prone. Precise data, such as those obtained from a chart review or a gold standard diagnostic test, may only be available on a subset of individuals due to cost or participant burden. We propose a method to augment a regression analysis of a gold standard time-to-event outcome with available error-prone disease diagnoses for the setting where the gold standard is observed on a subset. The proposed model addresses left-truncation and interval-censoring in time-to-event outcomes while leveraging information from the self-reported disease diagnosis in a joint likelihood for the gold standard and error-prone outcomes. The proposed model is applied to the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos data to quantify risk factors associated with diabetes onset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.