ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2025
U.S. Primary Care Practice Capabilities Linked to Language Services for Patients with Limited English Proficiency.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative evaluation of large language models on multiple-choice and image-based rheumatology questions.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients with limited English proficiency (LEP) experience more challenges with clinician communication than English-proficient patients. U.S. federal policies require the provision of language services, but little is known about language service availability in adult primary care practices nationally.
objectiveTo identify primary care physician practice capabilities associated with the routine availability of language services for patients with LEP.
designNationally representative physician practice survey data from the National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems were linked to IQVIA OneKey data and the American Community Survey (n = 1226). Multivariable logistic regression models were estimated to assess the association of practice characteristics with availability of language services. MAIN MEASURES: Whether a practice "always" provides professional language services. KEY
resultsFifty-four percent of U.S. primary care practices always provide language services. In adjusted analyses, practices participating in an ACO (odds ratio (OR) = 2.21, p < 0.01), owned by a healthcare system or hospital (OR = 6.0, p < 0.01), or with FQHC status (OR = 3.10, p < 0.01) were more likely to provide language services than non-ACO, non-FQHC, or independently owned practices. Practices with relatively high revenue from commercial health insurance (OR = 0.76, p < 0.01) were less likely to provide language services, whereas practices with relatively high Medicaid revenue (OR = 1.33, p < 0.01) were more likely.
conclusionsEven though it is required by law, almost half of U.S. primary care practices do not always provide language services to patients with LEP. Independently owned practices are less likely to offer language services than those owned by healthcare systems or hospitals, or practices with FQHC status, suggesting practice ownership can influence availability. ACO participation and a higher payer mix of Medicaid revenue are associated with language services availability, highlighting that policy reforms can support the routine provision of language services at the practice-level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.