ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2026
Mix and MATCH: The use of a Modular Approach for Youth Psychotherapy in Routine Clinical Care and Associations with Outcomes.
Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Modular psychotherapy-Toward personalized psychotherapy].Der Nervenarzt · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Modular Approach to Therapy for Children (MATCH) consists of individual evidence-based components (modules) that clinicians can flexibly select to target a range of emotional and behavioral symptoms. The treatment manual includes flowcharts that outline a sequence of modules recommended for each problem area: anxiety, depression, and conduct problems. This study explored the use of modules and associations with outcomes for youths who received MATCH in routine clinical care. The sample included 964 youths ages 3-17 (51% female, 52% White, 35% Hispanic, 9% Black) with primary anxiety, depression, or conduct problems. Youths typically received modules from the MATCH flowchart for their primary problem as well as some modules from other problem areas. The use of more modules from the flowchart for the youth's primary problem predicted greater clinician-rated improvement (Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement; CGI-I). In addition, youths with primary depression improved more when they received more modules from the anxiety flowchart and youths with primary conduct problems improved more when they received more modules from the depression flowchart, based on the CGI-I at the last timepoint. Providing more modules from the flowchart for a youth's primary problem area predicted the severity of top problems (Top Problems Assessment; TPA) at the last timepoint for youths with primary depression (based on caregiver and youth report) and primary conduct problems (based on caregiver report). Results suggest that clinicians should generally use modules from the flowchart for the youth's primary problem and incorporate modules from other problem areas to address additional concerns as needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41326917What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.