Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41326910›Full record

SynthesisActa neurochirurgica2025

Therapeutic role of venous sinus stenting in pediatric IIH: evidence review for clinical practice.

Dominik Vacínek, Adéla Bubeníková, Viktor Procházka, Petr Skalický, Vojtěch Novák, Ondřej Rýdlo, Róbert Leško, Aleš Vlasák, Ondřej Bradáč

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta neurochirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dominik VacínekDepartment of Neurosurgery, Second Medical Faculty, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, Prague, 156 00 Prague 5, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-5845-1516
Adéla BubeníkováDepartment of Neurosurgery, Second Medical Faculty, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, Prague, 156 00 Prague 5, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4532-9219
Viktor ProcházkaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Second Medical Faculty, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, Prague, 156 00 Prague 5, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5644-7616
Petr SkalickýDepartment of Neurosurgery, Second Medical Faculty, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, Prague, 156 00 Prague 5, Czech Republic. petr.skalicky@fnmotol.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7764-7254
Vojtěch NovákDepartment of Neurosurgery, Second Medical Faculty, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, Prague, 156 00 Prague 5, Czech Republic.
Ondřej RýdloDepartment of Neurosurgery, Second Medical Faculty, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, Prague, 156 00 Prague 5, Czech Republic.
Róbert LeškoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Second Medical Faculty, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, Prague, 156 00 Prague 5, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0753-2267
Aleš VlasákDepartment of Neurosurgery, Second Medical Faculty, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, Prague, 156 00 Prague 5, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5724-006X
Ondřej BradáčDepartment of Neurosurgery, Second Medical Faculty, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, Prague, 156 00 Prague 5, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4364-5522

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) in children is a rare but vision-threatening condition characterized by elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) without an identifiable cause. While medical therapy remains the first-line approach, a subset of pediatric patients remains refractory, necessitating surgical or endovascular interventions. Venous sinus stenting (VSS) has emerged as a promising, minimally invasive alternative to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunting, but its safety and efficacy in pediatric populations are not well-defined.

methodsA systematic literature review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, focusing on pediatric patients (< 18 years) with medically refractory IIH treated with VSS. Databases searched included PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and others, including studies published from January 1990 to September 2025. Data on patient selection, procedural outcomes, complications, and antiplatelet protocols were extracted and analyzed. Only studies rated ≥ 6 stars on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were included.

resultsSix primary studies were identified, reporting outcomes in 36 pediatric patients (mean age 13.32 ± 1.25 years). VSS led to marked improvement in headache (87.5%), papilledema (89.5%), and tinnitus (100%), with reduced need for acetazolamide in 66.7%. Complications included one retroperitoneal hematoma, decreased flow in the vein of Labbe and minor hemorrhagic events related to antiplatelet therapy, including epistaxis, menorrhagia, and oral bleeding leading to early discontinuation of clopidogrel. Persistent or recurrent symptoms after stenting underscore the need for individualized, multimodal evaluation, as standardized selection criteria for pediatric IIH are still lacking. The estimated retreatment rate across studies was approximately 20%, with re-stenting or CSF shunting required in select cases.

conclusionVSS appears to be a safe and effective treatment for selected pediatric IIH patients with venous sinus stenosis and demonstrable trans-stenotic gradients. However, its success relies heavily on appropriate patient selection and tailored antiplatelet management. Prospective pediatric studies and standardized guidelines are needed to clarify its optimal role in the therapeutic algorithm. Accordingly, our synthesis is intended to inform individualized decision-making in selected cases and does not constitute guideline-level recommendations.

Indexed as

Cranial SinusesPseudotumor CerebriStentsAdolescentChildEndovascular ProceduresHumansIdiopathic intracranial hypertensionSystematic reviewVenous sinus stenting

Identifiers

PMID41326910
PMCPMC12669330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.