ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Feasibility and safety of High-quality targeted temperature management in poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a multicenter prospective study with propensity-score matching.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This multicenter prospective study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of high-quality targeted temperature management (TTM) in patients with poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). A prospective parallel-controlled clinical trial was conducted across three hospitals in China. Patients with poor-grade aSAH were enrolled between April 2022 and April 2024. Eligible patients with poor-grade aSAH (Hunt-Hess grade IV-V) were divided into TTM (n = 45) and normothermia (n = 45) groups after 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) with nearest neighbor using age, gender, disease severity, comorbidities, and surgical variables. The TTM protocol involved initial 36-37℃, cooling to 34℃ post-aneurysm repair, hypothermia lasted for 3-5 days, followed by gradual rewarming with 0.1-0.25 °C/hour and normothermia maintenance. The TTM device used a temperature feedback system and a medical wrapped ice blanket. Primary outcomes included 3-month favorable functional prognosis [modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-3], with secondary outcomes assessing mortality, complications, and hospitalization metrics. Statistical analyses employed multivariable logistic regression and subgroup analyses to adjust for confounders. Among 124 enrolled patients, 90 (72.6%) were matched. The TTM group had a significantly higher rate of favorable outcomes (42.2% vs. 22.2%, P = 0.042) and improved neurological recovery (median GCS at discharge: 7.0 vs. 5.0, P = 0.048). A non-significant reduction in mortality was observed in the TTM group (20.0% vs. 31.1%, P = 0.227). TTM reduced DCI incidence (31.1% vs. 48.9%, P = 0.085) and demonstrated a comparable safety profile for systemic complications (e.g., pneumonia: 53.3% vs. 66.7%; cardiovascular events: 22.2-35.6%). However, TTM required prolonged hospitalization (median: 21 vs. 15 days, P = 0.030) and ICU stays (19 vs. 14 days, P = 0.075). Subgroup analyses revealed consistent benefits across age, severity, and surgical subgroups. In this exploratory study, high-quality TTM improved functional outcome and was associated with a non-significant reduction in DCI risk in poor-grade aSAH patients without increasing adverse events, though prolonged hospitalization was observed.These hypothesis-generating findings need further investigation through multicenter randomized trials to optimize TTM protocols and validate long-term benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41326862What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.