ReviewDie Anaesthesiologie2026
[Renal replacement therapy in intensive care medicine : Overview of the new S3 guidelines].
Review in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The publication in 2025 of the first S3 level guidelines on renal replacement therapy (RRT) in intensive care medicine provides the comprehensive, evidence-based recommendations for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). They define absolute indications that require the immediate initiation of RRT. Acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring RRT is common in the ICU and is associated with increased mortality. A narrative review of the new guidelines was performed by extracting and appraising recommendations on initiation, modality selection, anticoagulation, dosing, anti-infective therapy, weaning and post-ICU follow-up. Immediate RRT is mandated for absolute indications, such as life-threatening and refractory hypervolemia, electrolyte, acid-base or uremic disturbances. In the absence of these, a proactive early start is advised if the overall clinical picture (comorbidities, disease trajectory and the patients current condition) suggests a high likelihood of RRT becoming necessary. In other cases, a conservative management is possible. Continuous and intermittent techniques are considered therapeutically equivalent, whereby continuous or prolonged procedures are given priority in cases of hemodynamic instability. In cases of severe hyperkalemia a diffusive procedure with high dialysis flow is recommended. Regional citrate anticoagulation is preferred in patients with a risk of bleeding. For continuous RRT an effluent dose of 20-25 ml/kg body weight h
Indexed as
Identifiers
41326838What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.