ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Enhancing vertebral fracture prediction using multitask deep learning computed tomography imaging of bone and muscle.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in osteoporosis screening and fracture risk prediction among aging populations: a bibliometric evidence map.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Per-Vertebra Prediction of Future Osteoporotic Fractures from Routine Computed Tomography Using a Two-Stage Machine Learning Framework.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo develop and externally validate a computed tomography (CT)-based multitask learning model to predict fracture risk. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study was conducted in two parts, using a multitasking learning approach. We developed a cross-sectional vertebral fracture (VF) detection model using abdominal CT scans of 2553 patients aged 50-80 years. Then, we leveraged this detection model within a multitask learning framework to develop a longitudinal VF prediction model over a 5-year follow-up period. External testing was performed on 1506 patients from two independent hospitals. The performance was compared between the single-task and multitask models, bone-only and bone+muscle images, and image-only and clinical models.
resultsFor the cross-sectional fracture detection model, the mean age of the patients was 76.2 years, and 66.7% were female. In the classification task for detection of VF, the model using both bone and muscle showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.82 in the development set and 0.80 in the external test sets. Using multitask learning, the bone + muscle image model showed a c-index of 0.68 and had superior performance than the bone-only model in the external test set for 2-year, 3-year, and 5-year AUROCs (0.79 vs. 0.75, 0.71 vs. 0.68, and 0.71 vs. 0.68, respectively, all p < 0.01). Also, the multitask model significantly outperformed the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) (c-index: 0.68 vs. 0.66, p < 0.01).
conclusionThe CT-based multitask learning model integrating both bone and muscle data showed superior predictive performance for VFs compared with models using bone images only and traditional clinical models. KEY POINTS: Question Vertebral fracture risk remains underestimated in many individuals undergoing CT scans for other reasons, highlighting the need for improved opportunistic prediction tools. Findings A multitask deep learning model integrating both bone and muscle features from CT scans demonstrated superior performance compared to bone-only and traditional clinical models, including FRAX. Clinical relevance The proposed model enables accurate vertebral fracture risk prediction using routinely acquired CT scans, facilitating early identification and intervention without the need for additional tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.