Trial reportJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2026
Feasibility and effectiveness of a health educational intervention to improve navigation of health insurance benefits for in vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo determine the effectiveness of an educational intervention in improving health insurance literacy and utilization of in vitro fertilization insurance benefits.
methodsRandomized controlled trial, with 217 participants randomized in a 2:1 fashion to receive either an educational intervention or university-provided information sheet. Participants were 18 to 50 years, intending to conceive within a year, eligible for employee-offered health insurance coverage. The primary outcome was health insurance literacy. Secondary outcomes included comparing health insurance plans, plan selection, in vitro fertilization service utilization, benefit utilization, out-of-pocket costs, and acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the intervention materials. Semi-structured interviews evaluated participant experiences with intervention materials, plan selection, benefit utilization, in vitro fertilization services, and out-of-pocket costs.
resultsBoth groups reported low confidence using their health insurance (intervention: 1.00 [SD = 0.90], usual care: 0.74 [SD = 0.76], β = 0.26, 95% CI - 0.09, 0.62) and moderately high confidence being proactive when using their health insurance (intervention: 2.26 [SD = 0.86], usual care: 2.47 [SD = 0.58], β = - 0.20, 95% CI - 0.52, 0.11). Utilization of in vitro fertilization services was similar between groups (intervention: 40% [10/25], usual care: 45% [9/20]; p = 0.35). Use of insurance for these services did not differ between groups (intervention: 36% [9/25], usual care: 40% [8/20]; p = 0.78), and both groups experienced moderate out-of-pocket costs. Qualitative data revealed challenges in benefit utilization in both groups.
conclusionsDespite the educational intervention not improving health insurance literacy or in vitro fertilization benefit utilization, our findings suggest that being able to navigate health insurance benefits is essential for effective utilization of in vitro fertilization services. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTC05663645.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.