ArticleActa neurochirurgica2025
National variation in referral and surgical management of incident cervical disc herniation.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCervical disc herniation (CDH) in working-age adults may cause substantial functional impairment. But knowledge is sparse on their transition from primary care to specialist evaluation, and whether regional differences in referral pathways influence management and outcome.
aimTo examine regional variation in CDH referral pathways, surgical rates, and work capacity outcomes in Denmark's five healthcare regions.
methodsUsing national registry data, we identified 4,322 individuals aged 18-65 with incident CDH in 2017, defined as the first presentation to specialist health care with no CDH record in the preceding year. Patients were stratified by region and by department type at the first contact (medical, surgical, or emergency) in the specialized health care sector. Work capacity one year prior to diagnosis was categorized as low (< 20%), intermediate (20-80%), or high (≥ 80%) of a standard 37-h work week and followed for two years after the initial contact in the specialized health care sector.
resultsRegional rates of specialized health care contacts for incident CDH were comparable, at 12-13 per 10,000 residents in Denmark aged 18-65 years. Nationally, 1,296 per 10,000 patients seen in specialized health care underwent surgery. However, surgical rates varied markedly between regions, from 793 per 10,000 patients in the Capital Region to 2,320 per 10,000 patients in the North Denmark Region. Nationally, 60.5% of patients were referred to medical departments, 30.7% to surgical departments, and 8.8% to emergency departments, but the pathways differed substantially across the regions of Denmark. The highest surgical rate was observed among those referred through emergency departments, where 95 of 379 referred patients underwent surgery (2,507 per 10,000 patients). In contrast, medical departments evaluated 2,615 patients, of whom 182 received surgery (696 per 10,000 patients), while surgical departments evaluated 1,328 patients, with 283 undergoing surgery (2,132 per 10,000 patients). A total of 87% of patients with high and 83% with intermediate baseline work capacity regained pre-diagnosis work capacity within six months, whereas only 5% of those with low capacity achieved a work capacity of 20% or above within two years.
conclusionAlthough national referral rates for incident CDH with specialized healthcare sector contact are comparable, substantial regional disparities were observed in entry pathways and surgical intervention rates. These findings underscore the need to identify the optimal specialized clinical pathway for CDH patients who are refractory to initial conservative treatment in primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.