ArticlePediatric research2026
Comparison of eGFR equations for estimating kidney function in Chinese children.
Article in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Establishment of reference intervals for 41 serum biochemical analytes in healthy Chinese children.Practical laboratory medicine · 2026Article
- Does genetic susceptibility play a role in necrotizing enterocolitis?Pediatric research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a critical indicator of kidney function in kidney diseases. However, well-recognized estimated GFR (eGFR) equations for pediatric populations in specific cohorts remain elusive. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the performance of various eGFR equations against measured GFR (mGFR).
methodsA total of 221 children were included. Fourteen eGFR equations were compared with mGFR using Spearman's correlation analysis, Bland-Altman analysis, and by assessing bias, precision, and accuracy. Subgroup analyses were conducted to further evaluate the performance of eGFR equations.
resultsThe mGFR value showed no statistical difference from the eGFR values obtained using the CKiD (combined-creatinine (Cr)/cystatin C (CysC)/blood urea nitrogen (BUN)) and Tang (combined-Cr/CysC/BUN) equations (P = 0.265 and 0.653, respectively). The CKiD (combined-Cr/CysC/BUN) and Tang (combined-Cr/CysC/BUN) equations demonstrated the highest correlation (r = 0.509 and 0.455, respectively) and agreement (mean difference = -1.4 and 2.2, respectively), with the lowest bias (bias = 0.1 and 2.7, respectively) and the highest precision (median absolute value = 27.3 and 26.2, respectively) and accuracy (P
conclusionThe eGFR equations incorporating Cr, BUN, and CysC simultaneously demonstrated higher accuracy and precision. The CKiD (combined-Cr/CysC/BUN) and Tang (combined-Cr/CysC/BUN) equations exhibited the highest correlation and agreement with mGFR, suggesting their potential as alternatives when mGFR is unavailable in Chinese pediatric populations. IMPACT: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) serves as a crucial indicator of kidney function. In clinical settings, accurate assessment of GFR is vital for ensuring timely therapeutic interventions and enhancing patient outcomes. The eGFR equations that simultaneously incorporate creatinine (Cr), cystatin C (CysC), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) exhibit enhanced accuracy and precision. The CKiD (combined-Cr/CysC/BUN) and Tang (combined-Cr/CysC/BUN) equations demonstrated the strongest correlation and agreement with mGFR. This indicates that they may serve as viable alternatives when mGFR is not available in pediatric populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41326776What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.