ArticleDysphagia2026
Patient Perceptions on a Wearable Sensor Technology for Swallowing: A Qualitative Study with Patients with Parkinson's Disease.
Article in Dysphagia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Human-AI collaboration for dysphagia rehabilitation from effectiveness to implementation complexity: a systematic review.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wearable sensors show promise for monitoring breathing and swallowing events in patients with dysphagia. However, little is known about factors that facilitate their use for swallowing rehabilitation, particularly in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD). Examining these factors in patients with PD (PwPD) is critical given the prevalence of motor disorders in this population. The aims of this qualitative study were to explore PwPD's: 1) impressions of a novel wearable sensor and customized iOS application developed for monitoring swallowing and breathing; 2) recommendations and desired functions for future iterations; and 3) anticipated benefits and drawbacks of the sensor/app for managing swallowing difficulties. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with PwPD. Prior to the study session, a "sensor kit" was shipped to participants' homes. Study sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and inductively analyzed using a constant comparative approach. Study sessions were completed with 10 PwPD and 2 care partners. Five major themes were identified: 1) sensor/adhesive features; 2) wearing the sensor in public; 3) app features; 4) recommendations; and 5) anticipated benefits and drawbacks for managing swallowing disorders. PwPD highlighted the sensor's potential benefits for managing PD-related swallowing disorders, particularly the sensor's ability to track swallowing function over time. Participants' recommendations for additional features included adding reminder vibrations to prompt swallowing, however, they also expressed concerns about real-life use of the sensor including potential for sensory distractions and questioned the devices affordability. PwPD feedback revealed critical insights for the future adaptations of this innovative device for managing PD and related swallowing disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.