ArticleScientific reports2025
Hybrid parameter estimation and sensitivity analysis of PEM fuel cells using Rüppell's fox optimizer and Sobol metrics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An enhanced Draco lizard optimizer for accurate parameter extraction of proton exchange membrane fuel cells.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study proposes an advanced approach for optimizing and estimating the unknown parameters of proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) using the recently developed Rüppell's Fox Optimizer (RFO). The RFO is applied to minimize the sum of squared voltage errors between experimental and modeled data obtained under various operating conditions, subject to realistic system constraints. The algorithm's performance is validated using three widely recognized PEMFC benchmark cases: the Ballard Mark V, Horizon H-12 Stack, and Temasek 1 kW unit. These cases encompass different operating conditions, including variations in cell temperature and the partial pressures of hydrogen and oxygen, ensuring a comprehensive evaluation of the method's robustness and adaptability. Comparative analyses are conducted against recently published optimization techniques to assess the reliability, convergence behavior, and estimation accuracy of the RFO. Statistical performance indicators further substantiate the algorithm's capability in achieving precise parameter identification. Results demonstrate that the RFO offers a promising and efficient alternative for nonlinear, multi-parameter PEMFC modeling, providing accurate representations of experimental data and stable convergence across diverse test scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.