Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41326729›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026

Surgical strategy for laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy and segmentectomies of segments VII and VIII, considering the courses of P6a and the right hepatic vein.

Yusuke Yamamoto, Ryo Morimura, Taisuke Imamura, Hidemasa Kubo, Rie Shibata, Gakushi Kitamura, Hiroyuki Inoue, Kento Kurashima, Keiji Nishibeppu, Kenji Nanishi and 7 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Yusuke YamamotoDivision of Digestive Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan. yamayu-1@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-8740-8468
Ryo MorimuraDivision of Digestive Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Taisuke ImamuraDivision of Digestive Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Hidemasa KuboDivision of Digestive Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Rie ShibataDivision of Digestive Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Gakushi KitamuraDivision of Digestive Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Hiroyuki InoueDivision of Digestive Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Kento KurashimaDivision of Digestive Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Keiji NishibeppuDivision of Digestive Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Kenji NanishiDivision of Digestive Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Jun KiuchiDivision of Digestive Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Hiroki ShimizuDivision of Digestive Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Tomohiro AritaDivision of Digestive Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Toshiyuki KosugaDivision of Digestive Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Hirotaka KonishiDivision of Digestive Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Hitoshi FujiwaraDivision of Digestive Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Atsushi ShiozakiDivision of Digestive Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVariation along the right intersectional plane is pronounced when the portal branch P6a courses ventral to the right hepatic vein (RHV), complicating laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy (Lap-RPS) and segmentectomies of segments VII (Lap-SS7) and VIII (Lap-SS8). We sought to characterize the relevant venous anatomy and propose procedure-specific strategies.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed computed-tomography datasets from 55 hepatectomy patients. Cases were classified as Dorsal-P6a or Ventral-P6a; the latter was subtyped by whether the RHV reached the S5-S6 interface (Long- vs Short-RHV). Focusing on features pertinent to Lap-RPS, Lap-SS7, and Lap-SS8, we measured the inferior vena cava (IVC)-RHV angle, axial venous angles, depth of P7, and venous drainage territories.

resultsVentral-P6a occurred in 23/55 (42%): Long-RHV (n = 15) and Short-RHV (n = 8). Ventral-P6a showed a stepwise widening in IVC-RHV angle (median 34.6° in Dorsal-P6a; 51.8° in Ventral-P6a/Long-RHV; 76.7° in Ventral-P6a/Short-RHV). An inferior RHV (IRHV) was universal in Ventral-P6a/Short-RHV and had the largest drainage territory; a middle hepatic vein (MHV) branches draining S6 occurred only in Ventral-P6a (39%). The axial IRHV angle correlated positively with its drainage territory (P < 0.001).

conclusionsIn Ventral-P6a/Long RHV, the RHV often requires mid-course division during Lap-RPS. In Ventral-P6a/Short RHV, the wide IVC-RHV angle makes dorsal exposure of the RHV difficult. In 39% of Ventral-P6a, MHV branches cross the S5-S6 transection plane; during Lap-RPS it should be identified, and during Lap-SS8 it should be preserved. For Lap-SS7 in Ventral-P6a/Short-RHV, the IRHV typically runs deep and drains a large territory, favoring preservation.

Indexed as

HepatectomyHepatic VeinsLaparoscopyLiver NeoplasmsPortal VeinAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedMinimally invasive surgeryRight posterior sectionectomySegmentectomy of segment VIISegmentectomy of segment VIIIVentral-P6a

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.