Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41326728›Full record

SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2026

Single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass outcomes and complications: single-arm meta-analysis.

Josélio Rodrigues de Oliveira Filho, Pedro Bicudo Bregion, Rafaela Hamada Juca, Giulia Almiron da Rocha Soares, Marina Mordehachvili Burla, Victor Kenzo Ivano, Cornelia L Griggs

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Josélio Rodrigues de Oliveira FilhoDepartment of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Boston, USA. jrodriguesdeoliveirafilho@mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9061-2948
Pedro Bicudo BregionState University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
Rafaela Hamada JucaState University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
Giulia Almiron da Rocha SoaresSantos Metropolitan University, Santos, Brazil.
Marina Mordehachvili BurlaEstácio de Sá Vista Carioca University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Victor Kenzo Ivano *State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
Cornelia L Griggs *Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Boston, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSingle Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal (SASI) bypass combines sleeve gastrectomy with a single anastomosis to the ileum, preserving digestive continuity to reduce deficiencies while treating obesity-related conditions.

methodsThis study systematically reviewed SASI bypass outcomes and conducted a single-arm meta-analysis to assess its efficacy and safety. A comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane databases initially identified 387 articles, with 38 studies meeting inclusion criteria, contributing data on a maximum of 2,555 patients. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 60 months.

resultsMeta-analysis showed significant weight loss, with pooled Excess Weight Loss Percentage (EWL%) of 63.07% at 6 months, 82.44% at 12 months, and 93.21% at 24 months. The procedure demonstrated high remission rates for obesity-related conditions, including diabetes (92.67%), hypertension (79.06%), dyslipidemia (82.64%), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (81.63%), and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) (81.04%). Postoperative complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo grading system, with an overall mean complication rate of 13.70%. Mild complications (Grades I-II) accounted for 7.74%, while severe complications (Grades III-IV) had a mean rate of 5.18%. No deaths were reported.

conclusionsThese findings suggest SASI bypass is a highly effective metabolic and bariatric procedure, achieving substantial weight loss and high remission rates for multiple obesity-related conditions. Given its efficacy, SASI may benefit patients with higher body mass index (BMI) and multiple obesity-associated medical conditions. While most complications are mild and severe ones infrequent, further comparative studies are needed to establish its advantages over other bariatric techniques.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryGastrectomyIleumObesity, MorbidPostoperative ComplicationsAnastomosis, SurgicalHumansTreatment OutcomeWeight LossBariatric surgeryMeta-analysisObesity-associated medical problems remissionSingle anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.