ArticleScientific reports2025
Prediction of groundwater quality assessment by integrating boosted learning with DE optimizer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Seasonal water quality index prediction in Guilin karst water system: an explainable machine learning approach.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Transient Potential Profiling for Rapid Calcium Ion Quantification: Eliminating Conditioning Time in Solid-Contact Ion-Selective Electrodes.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Data driven water quality assessment using machine learning and synthetic data generation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Assessment of coastal bedrock groundwater quality in Jiaodong Peninsula via extension cloud model and resampling strategy.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Groundwater is eventually undermined by human activities, such as rapid industrialization, urbanization, over-extraction, and contamination from agricultural and urban sources. Among the different contaminants, the presence of minerals such as calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), sodium (Na), potassium (K), fluoride (F), and chloride (Cl) proves to have serious health risks when present in excess concentrations. This study addresses this gap by developing a predictive machine learning model to evaluate the groundwater quality index (GWQI) and to identify the critical contaminants affecting water safety. A total of 1989 groundwater samples were collected from Jajpur district, where the Sukinda Valley is located, and analyzed for multiple physicochemical parameters, as this region is known for extensive chromite mining activities and has been identified as one of the most critically polluted areas in India, posing significant groundwater contamination risks. This study introduces the novel hybrid machine learning model, LCBoost fusion, which distinguishes this work from previous studies by combining the strengths of CatBoost and LightGBM to enhance predictive accuracy. It has been achieved with the help of a hybrid machine learning model i.e. LCBoost fusion. The model outperforms individual models (CatBoost and LightGBM), by achieving low RMSE (0.6826), MSE (0.5100), MAE (0.3148) and a high [Formula: see text] score of 0.9810. Feature importance analysis highlights potassium (K), fluoride (F) and total hardness (TH) as the most influential indicators of groundwater contamination. This research successfully demonstrates the application of machine learning in assessing groundwater quality risks in Odisha, with practical implications for real-time groundwater monitoring and risk mitigation. LCBoost Fusion model offers a reliable and efficient approach for real-time groundwater monitoring and risk mitigation. These findings will help environmental organizations and policy makers to map out targeted places for sustainable groundwater management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.