ArticleScientific reports2025
Developing and validating prediction models for low back pain and neck pain in office workers: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Office workers frequently report low back pain (LBP) and neck pain (NP) related to sedentary work. While several prognostic risk factors of muscle performances have been identified, accurate predictive models are essential. This study aimed to develop and validate prediction models of LBP and NP among office workers. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 170 office workers aged 20-59 years, all with over one year of experience and daily computer use exceeding six hours. Participants underwent muscles performance tests for LBP and NP, including assessments of trunk muscles stability and endurance, lumbar lordotic curve, a multi-joint strength test and the neck strength and endurance tests. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to develop a predicting models, calculating odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Model performance was validated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves, area under the curve (AUC), and validity indexes. The prevalence rates were 59.4% for LBP and 72.4% for NP. Higher body fat percentage was associated with an increased risk of LBP (OR:1.06, 95%CI:1.01-1.12), while a greater lumbar lordotic curve was associated with reduced risk (OR:0.96, 95%CI:0.92-0.99). For NP, greater deep neck flexor endurance was significantly associated with a lower risk (OR:0.98, 95%CI:0.97-0.99). The prediction models demonstrated acceptable discrimination, with an AUC of 0.65 (95%CI: 0.56-0.73) for LBP and 0.64 (95%CI: 0.54-0.73) for NP. The developed predictive models show potential for integration into clinical decision-making to guide the development of workplace safety and intervention programs aimed at preventing LBP and NP in office workers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.