ArticleScientific reports2025
Learning to compress electrocardiogram signals on a quick response code.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The electrocardiogram (ECG) is a widely acknowledged clinical tool for diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). In low and middle income countries (LMICs), the lack of connected health (CH) systems often results in ECG data being shared via paper records, risking privacy breaches. One potential solution is embedding ECG data within a quick response (QR) code, enabling secure transmission of clinically essential information while preserving patient privacy. In this paper, we propose a learning-based compression method that preserves essential clinical information which is further encoded losslessly using the Brotli algorithm for QR code embedding. We have experimentally validated our approach on publicly available dataset containing ECG recordings from healthy individuals and with 26 distinct CVD pathologies. Key performance is assessed using Percentage Root-Mean-Square Difference (PRD), Structural Similarity Index (SSIM), and Compression Factor (CF) along with morphological features comparisons between original and decompressed lead-II ECG signals. At CF of 82.37, we have attained PRD of 2.70%, SSIM of 0.94 for lead-II ECG signal, and PRD of 2.80%, SSIM of 0.94 for lead-I ECG signal. Our method outperforms state-of-the-art approaches, enabling secure, efficient, and scalable ECG integration into CH systems for continuous monitoring and early detection of CVDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.