ArticleScientific reports2025
MultiModal craniocerebral diagnose based on 3D CT and image reports.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cranial imaging diagnosis analyzes lesions in cranial CT images, automatically determining information such as lesion type, providing physicians with diagnostic recommendations, and saving valuable time during urgent medical events like stroke. Most current mainstream diagnostic generation methods rely on single-modal data for analysis, such as imaging reports or a single CT slice. However, relying on a single CT slice leads to loss of lesion information which across different CT slices. In addition, imaging reports often contain only coarse descriptions of abnormal regions without detailed pixel-level features, resulting in insufficient lesion characterization. Moreover, some works directly use 3D CNN to process entire 3D CT scans, but using only 3D CNN makes it challenging to accurately identify very small lesions. Therefore, this paper proposes a multimodal diagnostic model called MM-CD (MultiModal Craniocerebral Diagnose), which integrates imaging reports and cranial 3D CT findings for joint diagnosis. Specifically, this study first uses a 2D image pretrained model in combination with a vertical-dimension weight generation module for the cranial 3D CT images, enabling the model to focus on abnormal CT slices. Next, a multi-scale image fusion module is designed to effectively consolidates lesion descriptions from multiple CT slices into a single slice. Followed by a self-attention mechanism, this paper integrates CT information with the imaging report to construct a more comprehensive diagnostic reference. This clinically oriented design aims to lower missed-diagnosis rates for small, spatially sparse lesions and to shorten door-to-treatment intervals in acute care. Experimental results on a real clinical dataset show that the method improves overall accuracy by 1.65% compared to existing state-of-the-art medical multimodal models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.