Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41326546›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Development of ultrasonic model-based iterative reconstruction technique for concrete structures with corroded rebars.

Abdulrahman M Alanazi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Abdulrahman M AlanaziDepartment of Electrical Engineering, College of Applied Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11362, Saudi Arabia. Aalanazi1@ksu.edu.sa.

Funding

Ongoing Research Funding program, King Saud University ORF-2025-1335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensuring the durability of reinforced concrete structures is a central challenge in structural health monitoring (SHM). Corrosion of embedded steel rebars is among the most common and damaging deterioration mechanisms, yet its early detection remains difficult due to the complexity of wave propagation in concrete and the presence of strong clutter from surface layers and structural heterogeneity. Ultrasonic imaging provides a promising nondestructive tool, but conventional reconstruction approaches often suffer from limited contrast and high background interference. In this work, a novel reconstruction approach, termed Baseline Cancellation UMBIR (BACU), is proposed to effectively mitigate baseline-related artifacts while maintaining high image fidelity. The method integrates baseline subtraction into the ultrasonic model-based iterative reconstruction (UMBIR) framework, suppressing dominant direct arrivals and low-rank background responses while preserving target-related signals. This formulation improves robustness to modeling errors and limited array coverage, both of which are common in practical SHM applications. Synthetic experiments based on a concrete specimen with an embedded rebar demonstrate the advantages of the proposed approach compared to the conventional UMBIR. The proposed method achieves stronger suppression of clutter, sharper localization of the rebar, and improved preservation of contrast across varying corrosion levels. These results provide more reliable and interpretable reconstructions, advancing the use of ultrasonic imaging for nondestructive evaluation, and long-term monitoring of critical infrastructure.

Indexed as

Baseline cancellationModel-based inversionNon-destructive testingPrinciple component analysisStructural health monitoringUltrasonic imaging

Identifiers

PMID41326546
PMCPMC12695999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.