ArticleScientific reports2025
Identification of Indigenous fish species in lake Tana using deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identification of indigenous fish species is crucial for sustainable fisheries management and biodiversity conservation. The traditional expert systems of fish identification are inconsistent and time-consuming. In an attempt to address this weakness, we leveraged cutting-edge deep learning techniques, namely various iterations of the You Only Look Once (YOLO) algorithm, i.e., YOLOv5, YOLOv7, YOLOv8, and YOLOv11. Our study introduces a new data set of 13,000 images of 16 indigenous species of fish acquired from the Bahir Dar Fishery and Other Aquatic Life Research Center in Ethiopia. We used a whole preprocessing pipeline that included image enhancement techniques, CSPDarkNet, Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG), and segmentation-based image feature extraction, along with Roboflow annotations. The new approach significantly improved the dataset quality and usability to train models. Besides, we experimented using various hyperparameters, such as activation functions (Softmax, ReLU), optimizers (AdamW, SGD), batch sizes (32, 16), learning rates (0.01, 0.001), and epochs (100, 50). Our experiment confirms that YOLOv11n achieved the best mean Average Precision (mAP) of 94.7% when trained using 100 epochs with the AdamW optimizer. This study confirms that the combination of a well-designed dataset, sophisticated preprocessing techniques, and effective deep learning architectures provides a robust and practical paradigm for indigenous fish species identification, thereby enhancing aquatic biodiversity conservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.