Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41326538›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Effects of problematic social media use on depressive symptoms.

María Blanquer-Cortés, Estefanía Estévez, J Francisco Estévez-García, Daniel Lloret-Irles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

María Blanquer-CortésDepartment of Health Psychology, Miguel Hernández University (UMH), Elche, 03202, Alicante, Spain.
Estefanía EstévezDepartment of Health Psychology, Miguel Hernández University (UMH), Elche, 03202, Alicante, Spain.
J Francisco Estévez-GarcíaDepartment of Sociology II, University of Alicante (UA), San Vicente del Raspeig, 03690, Alicante, Spain.
Daniel Lloret-IrlesDepartment of Health Psychology, Miguel Hernández University (UMH), Elche, 03202, Alicante, Spain. daniel.lloret@umh.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study is to determine how problematic social media use (PSMU), social media use frequency (SMU), and the number of followers (SMF) predict depressive symptoms evolution in adolescents, while evaluating the moderating effects of gender and age. Longitudinal data from 2,121 adolescents (52.38% female) were analysed at two time points (T1, T2) with a mean age (T1) of 13.79 years. Quantile regression models (τ = 0.25, 0.50, 0.75) revealed that problematic use and SMU were associated with increased depressive symptoms across all quantiles. Higher SMU predicted greater increases in depressive symptoms, particularly among younger adolescents. The interaction between SMF and SMU, also SMF and gender, was significantly associated with depressive outcomes; in particular, the effect of a higher number of followers was more pronounced among girls, and when combined with low use, it increased depressive symptoms. These findings suggest that SMU has a differential impact on depressive symptoms depending on the initial severity, with those exhibiting more severe baseline symptoms being more affected. Importantly, these results indicate that interventions for adolescent social media use may be tailored to their baseline mental health status, age, and gender; supporting current global regulatory trends aimed at increasing the age threshold for access to social media platforms.

Indexed as

DepressionSocial MediaAdolescentFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleAdolescentsDepressionLongitudinalSocial media

Identifiers

PMID41326538
PMCPMC12764767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.