ArticleScientific reports2025
Explainable few-shot learning with modern BERT for detecting emerging phishing attacks using XF PhishBERT.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Few-shot android malware classification with quantum-enhanced prototypical learning and drift detection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A scalable hybrid computational intelligence framework with bio inspired optimization for high dimensional malicious URL inference.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phishing attacks continue to evolve rapidly, with new campaigns emerging faster than traditional detection systems can adapt. Existing machine learning approaches require extensive labeled datasets, creating vulnerability windows when novel attack patterns appear. This limitation is particularly problematic in cybersecurity where obtaining large labeled datasets for emerging threats is time-consuming and expensive. This paper presents XF-PhishBERT, an explainable few-shot learning framework for phishing detection that combines ModernBERT transformer architecture with domain-specific URL features. The approach integrates prototypical networks and model-agnostic meta-learning (MAML) to enable effective detection with minimal training examples. A consensus-based feature selection methodology combines Random Forest importance, Mutual Information, and Recursive Feature Elimination with Cross-Validation (RFECV) to identify optimal feature subsets. The framework incorporates comprehensive explainability through SHAP analysis, attention visualization, and counterfactual explanations. Experimental evaluation on two datasets demonstrates that XF-PhishBERT achieves 99.9% accuracy with 10 examples per class and maintains 98.5% accuracy in one-shot learning scenarios. Cross-dataset evaluation shows 186% performance retention compared to 39% for traditional methods. Ablation studies confirm the contribution of each component, with ModernBERT integration providing 4.54 percentage point improvement over baseline approaches. Real-world deployment through a browser extension validated practical utility with 98.3% precision and 42ms average latency. The results demonstrate that few-shot learning can address the fundamental challenge of limited labeled data in cybersecurity applications while providing transparent decision-making support for security analysts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.