ArticleScientific reports2025
The in vitro effect of electronic versus conventional cigarettes on color stability and surface roughness of dental resin composites.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Color stability of different aligner attachment composites following exposure to conventional and electronic cigarette smoke.Odontology · 2026Article
- Surface roughness and wear resistance of ormocer- versus methacrylate-based single-shade resin composites after simulated tooth brushing.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Effect of Flavored, Blond, and Filterless Cigarette Smoke on the Color Stability and Surface Roughness of a Nanohybrid Resin Composite: An in vitro Study.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The appearance quality of dental restoration is recognized as crucial for the oral health-related quality of life. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effect of electronic and conventional cigarettes on the color stability and surface roughness of dental composites. Eighty-four specimens of four composites (multi-shade: Tetric Prime, Neo Spectra ST-HV, and single-shade: Charisma Diamond One, Omnichroma; n = 21/material) were exposed to electronic cigarettes, conventional cigarettes, or artificial saliva (control) for 60 days using an automated smoking simulator with special robotic system for brushing, finishing, and polishing, mimicked six months of heavy smoking. Color and roughness were measured at baseline, after exposure, and post-thermocycling using a spectrophotometer and optical profilometer. Statistical analysis (SPSS v25) employed a three-way ANOVA, Bonferroni post hoc, and Pearson correlation (p < 0.05). The color stability was significantly different according to the type of treatment. In comparison, surface roughness was not affected by any treatment. The correlation between color stability and surface roughness was significant negative (p-value = 0.017). This study showed that conventional cigarettes caused higher discoloration than electronic cigarettes. While multi-shade resin-based composite materials had lower color stability than single-shade counterparts. On the other hand, neither smoking nor thermocycling negatively affected the surface roughness of materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.