ArticleScientific reports2025
Managing ecosystem service deficits through ecological-social prioritization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arid and semi-arid regions face extensive challenges in sustaining ecosystem services due to increasing environmental and socio-economic pressures. Understanding the complex interactions between social and ecological systems in these regions is essential for achieving spatial sustainability. This study introduces a comprehensive framework integrating spatial analysis, statistical modeling, and Bayesian networks to assess the supply and demand of eight key ecosystem services across Iran, including forage, water yield, medicinal plants, mushroom, carbon sequestration, pollination, recreation, and aesthetic value. The results revealed that at least 60% of the country's area is deficient in one or more ecosystem services. The greatest deficiencies were observed in forage (78%), pollination (75%), and mushroom (26%), primarily concentrated in downstream areas. Principal component analysis (PCA) indicated that, from an ecological perspective, water services and carbon sequestration play the most critical roles, whereas, from a social perspective, water services, pollination, and forage hold the highest priority. Statistically significant differences were identified in service demand among stakeholder groups (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the relationships between services showed that synergistic interactions prevailed at the supply level (p < 0.01), while trade-off relationships dominated at the demand level (p < 0.05). Bayesian network modeling identified population, land-use change and management as the most influential socio-economic drivers of the supply-demand mismatch in ecosystem services. Spatially, the highest sensitivity to threatening factors was observed in medical plant services (78%) and aesthetic values (74%). By integrating ecological and social dimensions, this approach offers a practical tool for informed decision-making, sustainable resource management, and effective environmental planning in arid and semi-arid ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.