ArticleScientific reports2025
Analysis of biodiversity distribution patterns around the plateau lake based on the MaxEnt and InVest models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Habitat Shifts and Conservation Challenges of Falconidae Under Climate Change in Northwestern China.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- The influence of bottom-up and top-down effects on the distribution and density of common leopards (Panthera pardus) in an Eastern Himalayan landscape.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The increasing fragmentation of habitats is accelerating biodiversity loss, particularly in high-altitude cities’ ecologically fragile green spaces (GSs). The scientific assessment of the distribution patterns of biodiversity (DPOB) in the Circum-Erhai Lake region (CELR) is of great significance for sustainability. We identified GSs using fractional vegetation coverage. The InVEST habitat quality (HQ) module assessed HQ, while GIS evaluated ecological sensitivity (ES). Subsequently, using HQ and ES as environmental variables, we applied the MaxEnt Model to predict the suitable habitat of key species. Finally, HQ, ES, and species distribution results served as proxies for biodiversity to predict DPOB. Key findings: (1) CELR’s overall biodiversity is relatively high, showing a “high in forests, low along Erhai shores” pattern. (2) Core GSs are scarce (1.36% of total GS area). (3) The GSs with high quality ecosystem dominate in high-altitude forests (70.60%). (4) The GSs suitable for key species (18.87%) are mainly distributed in flat areas on the west bank of Erhai Lake. (5) The GSs of non suitable area cover 219.23 km²(20.19%). Based on the ecosystem and biodiversity levels, we constructed a hierarchical planning framework for GSs around the Erhai Lake area. The findings of this study contribute to identifying priority areas for biodiversity conservation and facilitate the development of sustainable ecological management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.