ArticleScientific reports2025
Automated breast cancer diagnosis via intensity-guided contour segmentation and ResNet-based classification using local intensity pattern tensors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the world, breast cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality among women who have been diagnosed with cancer. A timely finding and accurate diagnosis are essential to the development of effective therapy and increased survival rates. This study proposes a novel approach for the segmentation and classification of breast cancer lesions using the Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM). The methodology begins with the preprocessing of mammogram images to enhance contrast and reduce noise. A segmentation technique, Intensity-Guided Adaptive Contour (IGAC), is employed to accurately extract regions of interest (ROIs) representing potential lesions. The IGAC method adapts based on intensity variations to capture the complex boundaries of lesions, minimizing interference from surrounding tissues. For feature extraction, a Local Intensity-Pattern Tensor (LIPT) is utilized to derive shape, texture, and intensity-based metrics from the segmented regions. These features provide a comprehensive representation of the lesions, which are indicative of benign or malignant patterns. A deep learning model based on the Residual Neural Network (ResNet) architecture is then used for classification, categorizing mammogram images into benign, malignant, or normal. The ResNet model leverages its depth and skip connections to ensure robust learning and high classification accuracy. Performance evaluation focuses on accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, demonstrating the effectiveness of this integrated approach for breast cancer detection and classification. The performance of this work is demonstrated by the following metrics: an accuracy of 99.97%, a sensitivity of 99.34%, a specificity of 99.13%, a precision of 98.39%, and an F1 score of 99.01%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.