ArticleScientific reports2025
Fractional orthopair fuzzy decision framework for sustainable water resource management in urban areas.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A soft computing TOPSIS framework with fractional orthopair fuzzy sine aggregation for robust model evaluation in data science.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sustainable urban water management is increasingly challenged by uncertainty, imprecision, and hesitancy in evaluating alternative water sources. This study proposes a novel multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework based on fractional orthopair fuzzy (FOF) sets, designed to model partial hesitancy and fractional expert judgments more effectively than traditional fuzzy methods. Integrating an entropy-based weighting scheme and the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), the framework is applied to assess water resource alternatives in Lahore, Pakistan a city facing rapid groundwater depletion, urban expansion, and declining surface water quality. The evaluation considers three key criteria: water quality, availability, and affordability across the alternatives of surface water, groundwater, and rainwater. Results show that rainwater harvesting is the most sustainable option, with a closeness coefficient of [Formula: see text], outperforming alternatives in terms of both cost-effectiveness and safety. Sensitivity analysis on parameters ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]) confirms the model's robustness. The findings offer actionable guidance for water authorities, emphasizing the importance of rainwater harvesting and reduced reliance on depleting groundwater. The proposed model is adaptable to other urban regions, provided expert input and contextual data are available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.