ArticleScientific reports2025
A portable dry-electrode ECG device for rapid and accurate neonatal heart rate monitoring during resuscitation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A framework for generative AI-driven extraction of clinical user needs in pediatric device development.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Each year, around 10% of infants globally will require resuscitation at birth. Pediatricians can use stethoscope, electrocardiogram (ECG) or pulse oximetry to determine heart rate (HR) which is used to guide resuscitation steps. HR must be acquired accurately and quickly. However, current HR detection modalities are either inaccurate or too slow. This work offers a novel infant heart rate detector (iHRD) using single-lead dry electrode ECG that can display HR accurately within the first 10 seconds of initial contact. A research ethics board approved validation study is conducted on 50 healthy newborns comparing iHRD's HR with clinical HR monitors at a community hospital. 3-minute newborn single-lead ECGs and HR are recorded, and HR is annotated every 2 seconds. Statistical HR analysis is performed to ensure iHRD's feasibility and reliability. With 2741 HR datapoints, excluding outliers, the iHRD detected HR with 94.5% accuracy with time from contact to HR display under 10 seconds. Overall, the iHRD using dry electrode single-lead ECG showed good results in providing reliable HR quickly for neonatal resuscitation efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.