Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41326443›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Development and validation of peaters choice, an intervention module for healthcare practitioners in managing picky eating among children aged 3-5 years.

Mohd Shah Kamarudin, Nur Hana Hamzaid, Mohd Razif Shahril, Hasnah Haron, Masne Kadar, Nik Shanita Safii

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohd Shah KamarudinFaculty of Sports Science and Recreation, University Teknologi MARA Perlis, Arau, 02600, Malaysia.
Nur Hana HamzaidCenter for Rehabilitation & Special Need Studies (iCaRehab), Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Campus, Kuala Lumpur, 50300, Malaysia. hanahamzaid@ukm.edu.my.
Mohd Razif ShahrilCenter for Healthy Ageing & Wellness (H-CARE), Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Campus, Kuala Lumpur, 50300, Malaysia.
Hasnah HaronCenter for Healthy Ageing & Wellness (H-CARE), Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Campus, Kuala Lumpur, 50300, Malaysia.
Masne KadarCenter for Rehabilitation & Special Need Studies (iCaRehab), Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Campus, Kuala Lumpur, 50300, Malaysia.
Nik Shanita SafiiCenter for Community Health Studies (ReaCH), Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Campus, Kuala Lumpur, 50300, Malaysia.

Funding

Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia FRGS/1/2021/SKK06/UKM/03/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Picky eating (PE) during early childhood is a growing concern, often linked to poor dietary intake and increased parental stress. While healthcare professionals (HCPs) are well-positioned to assist, there remains a lack of structured, evidence-based modules to guide PE management in public health settings. This research aim to develop a validated healthy eating intervention module for HCPs in managing picky eaters (PEaters Choice). The module development followed the first three phases of the ADDIE instructional design model: Analysis, Design, and Development. Phase 1 (Analysis) involved a scoping review, a quantitative, and qualitative study, while Phase 2 (Design) focused on designing the module content and aligning activities with relevant theoretical frameworks. In Phase 3 (Development), nine experts evaluated the newly developed module using face and content validity forms. Findings from Phases 1 and 2 informed a multidisciplinary module design, guiding its objectives, content, and delivery based on evidence and stakeholder input. In general, the PEaters Choice module surpassed established benchmarks, achieving high validity scores (> 80%) and S-CVI/Ave (> 0.80). Face validity results also confirmed the module's relevance, clarity of instruction, and alignment with its intended objectives of empowering HCPs to effectively manage pediatric PE in the public health setting. The PEaters Choice module demonstrates strong preliminary validity and offers a structured tool to assist HCPs in managing PE among children. While implementation and impact evaluation remain future steps, the current version provides a foundation for broader application and potential to empower both HCPs and parents.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorFeeding BehaviorFood PreferencesHealth PersonnelChild, PreschoolDiet, HealthyFemaleHumansMaleEducationIntervention moduleModule development and validity moduleParentingPicky eatersSensory

Identifiers

PMID41326443
PMCPMC12669771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.