ArticleScientific reports2025
Recognition method for microgrid switching misoperations based on multi-source heterogeneous data fusion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To enhance the safety of microgrid switching and the identification of misoperations, we propose Time-Synchronized Misoperation Recognition (TS-MR), a method tailored to switching operations. The approach performs rule-based pre-screening grounded in operating procedures and anti-misoperation interlocking, achieves millisecond-level time synchronization of multi-source heterogeneous data via a two-stage scheme that combines variational Bayesian inference with a UKF, and employs a fusion of a Transformer, a TCN, and a GNN for cross-modal representation with interpretable discrimination. Laboratory records constitute the training, validation, and test sets; HIL data are used solely for independent cross-validation; and public datasets are used only for cross-domain robustness calibration, and none contributes to training, validation, or threshold tuning. Under a unified evaluation protocol, TS-MR attains 94.69% accuracy and an AUC of 0.977 in typical switching scenarios; end-to-end latency is about 80 ms; the core forward-pass latency is about 42 ms; the [Formula: see text] per-inference latency is 55 ms; and computational complexity is about 3.4 GFLOPs. Compared with CNN-BiLSTM, ConvLSTM, and GAT under identical preprocessing, time synchronization, and fixed random seeds, TS-MR improves accuracy by 0.9 to 3.7% points and AUC by 0.024 to 0.057. These results indicate that TS-MR provides high-confidence misoperation recognition and interpretable assessment for microgrid switching while satisfying engineering-grade real-time constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.