ArticleNature communications2025
Construction of waste-to-resource knowledge graph for industrial symbiosis identification using large language models.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Construction of waste-to-resource knowledge graph for industrial symbiosis identification using large language models.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Circular Economy offers a promising approach to achieve sustainability goals by circulating resources and closing resource loops. Industrial Symbiosis adopts similar concept in industrial systems that reduces raw material consumption and waste production through collaborative waste-to-resource exchanges. While waste-to-resource databases provide valuable knowledge for IS opportunity identification, existing databases are mainly constructed manually and are restricted by their sizes and scalability. In this work, we propose an automated framework to construct a Waste-to-Resource Knowledge Graph (W2RKG) from pertinent research papers using Large Language Models, which enhances coverage, scalability, and standardisation of the resulting database. The framework comprises a Retrieving Module, an Extraction Module, and a Fusion Module, that collectively transform unstructured text into a well-organised knowledge graph. The final constructed database contains 3518 waste entities, 4471 resource entities and 33,679 waste-to-resource relationships. Extensive experiments and evaluation results demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed method and the overall high quality of the constructed database. The study, thereby, contributes an automatic framework for waste-to-resource database construction and provides a readily accessible W2RKG to support Industrial Symbiosis practitioners in identification applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.