ArticleNature communications2025
Real-space machine learning of correlation density functionals.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward Doubly Local Double Hybrid Functionals Using Neural-Network Local Mixing Functions.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Algorithmic differentiation for plane-wave DFT: materials design, error control and learning model parameters.npj computational materials · 2026Article
- Real-space machine learning of correlation density functionals.Nature communications · 2025Article
- An Analysis of Regularized Second-Order Energy Expressions in the Context of Post-HF and KS-DFT Calculations: What Do We Gain and What Do We Lose?Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Data-Driven Improvement of Local Hybrid Functionals: Neural-Network-Based Local Mixing Functions and Power-Series Correlation Functionals.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) plays a pivotal role in extending the reach of quantum chemistry methods for simulating both molecules and materials. However, leveraging ML to overcome the limitations of human-designed density functional approximations (DFAs), the primary workhorse for quantum simulations, remains a major challenge due to their severely limited transferability to unseen chemical systems. Here, we demonstrate how transferability is achieved using real-space ML, where energies are learned point by point in space through energy densities. Central to our real-space learning strategy is the derivation and implementation of correlation energy densities from regularized perturbation theory. This enables two key advances toward constructing highly transferable DFAs, grounded in the Møller-Plesset adiabatic connection framework, for correlation energies defined with respect to the Hartree-Fock reference. First, we introduce the Local Energy Loss, whose data efficiency (expanding each system's single energy into thousands of data points) dramatically enhances transferability when combined with a physically informed ML model. Second, we formulate a real-space, machine-learned, and regularized extension of Spin-Component-Scaled second-order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory, yielding transferable DFAs that effectively mitigate the self-interaction errors common to traditional DFAs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.