Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41326296›Full record

ArticleThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2025

Solving the 'Goldilocks problem' in dementia clinical trials with multimodal AI.

Andrew E Welchman, Zoe Kourtzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrew E WelchmanProdromic Ltd, Milton Hall, Ely Road, Milton, Cambridge CB24 6WZ, UK.
Zoe KourtziDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3 EB, UK. Electronic address: zk240@cam.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of effective therapeutics for Alzheimer's Disease and related dementias (ADRD) has been hindered by patient heterogeneity and the limitations of current diagnostic tools. New treatments have no chance of working if given to patients who cannot benefit from them. This perspective explores how advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly multimodal machine learning, can solve the 'Goldilocks problem' of identifying patients for inclusion in clinical trials and support precision treatment in real-world healthcare settings. We examine the challenges of patient stratification, grounded by a conceptual framework of identifying each person's stage and subtype of dementia. We review data from several clinical trials of Alzheimer's disease therapeutics, to explore how AI-guided patient stratification can improve trial outcomes, reduce costs and improve recruitment. Further, we discuss the integration of AI into clinical workflows, the importance of model interpretability and generalizability, and ethical imperative to address algorithmic bias. By combining AI with scientific insight, clinical expertise, and patient experience, we argue that intelligent analytics can accelerate the discovery and delivery of new diagnostics and therapeutics, ultimately transforming dementia care and improving outcomes for patients around the globe.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseaseClinical trialsCognitionEarly predictionImagingMultimodal AI

Identifiers

PMID41326296
PMCPMC12811767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.