ArticleContemporary clinical trials2025
Protocol for a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial of a mind-body activity program for older adults with chronic pain in a medically underserved area: The iHOPE study.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06119698 (Randomized, Hybrid Type 1 Effectiveness-implementation Trial of GetActive+ vs Treatment as Usual; iHOPE Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized, Hybrid Type 1 Effectiveness-implementation Trial of GetActive+ vs Treatment as Usual; iHOPE Study
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Considerations for a Mind-Body Program for Latine Adults with Chronic Pain and Cognitive Impairment: A Qualitative Study with Healthcare Providers.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOlder adults in medically underserved areas (MUAs) are disproportionately affected by chronic musculoskeletal pain but lack access to safe, evidence-based psychosocial treatments. Staff at community clinics, where many disadvantaged older adults receive care, must manage complex pain needs and comorbidities with limited time and resources. Shared medical visits integrate medical care, education, and peer support, offering a feasible, scalable solution to overcome barriers associated with chronic pain management in primary care. We previously developed GetActive+, an intervention delivered through shared medical visits at a community clinic to teach mind-body and activity skills to older adults with chronic pain. Here, we describe the protocol for a fully powered hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing GetActive+ to treatment as usual (TAU).
methodsWe will recruit 200 English and Spanish-speaking older adult patients from two Massachusetts community clinics located in an MUA. We will assess multimodal physical function and psychosocial outcomes at baseline, post-intervention (11 weeks), and follow-up (6 months). Effectiveness will be determined by improvements in self-reported physical function post-intervention compared to TAU. Using mixed methods, we will assess implementation outcomes (feasibility, acceptability, fidelity, and adoption) at patient, provider, and organizational levels.
resultsThe trial is ongoing. We have enrolled 54 older adults, 21 of whom have completed post-intervention assessments.
conclusionWe describe the implementation and evaluation of a mind-body activity intervention for older adults with chronic pain using shared medical visits. Results will inform subsequent implementation and dissemination efforts of GetActive+ in community clinics across the United States. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06119698.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.